LS2017 - Paper submission

Guidelines for authors

High-quality papers covering one or more of the above topics should be submitted electronically via

Authors can only submit full papers for a double-blind peer review process. The papers should be prepared according to the ISPRS guidelines for preparing manuscripts and should not exceed 8 pages.
Guidelines and templates can be found at http://www.isprs.org/documents/orangebook/app5.aspx. Accepted papers will appear in a designated volume of the Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and the Spatial Information Sciences.

Attention

Note that according to ISPRS regulations, only anonymous papers are allowed to enter the blind review process. Therefore be sure to leave blank the author information and acknowledgments in your submitted full paper. After review you will have the opportunity to add this information again.

Guidelines for presentations

• Oral Presentation Requirements
• Poster Presentation Requirements

Guidelines for reviewers

Dear reviewer,

Thank you for your help in reviewing manuscripts submitted to LS2017. Please make sure that you access the full paper manuscript via https://easychair.org.

When evaluating the manuscript, please consider the following aspects:

Content:
Are the used methods appropriate? Is the paper technically correct? Are interpretations and conclusions justified by derived results? Is the evaluation convincing?

Novelty:
Do the authors present original work? Do you judge the method or application to be innovative?

Relevance:
Is the topic relevant for LS2017, compare Scope and Topics.

Clarity and Presentation:
Is the paper well-written and well-structured? Are explanations clear? Is the method reproducible for readers? Are enough or even too much details provided? Are figures clear and informative? Is the format in accordance with the author guidelines?

Literature Review:
Are references adequate? Is proper credit given to existing work?

Overall Rating:
What is your overall recommendation, considering the above aspects?

In addition, please give some recommendations to improve the manuscript.

Please note that a review can give positive and negative feedback to authors, and that it should be sufficiently detailed in explaining the provided rating to the authors.

Kind regards,
The LS2017 Organizing Committee